Re-posted August 16, 2007
(originally posted before the South Dakota
March 25, 2006
The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter
or Reform Abusive Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights
"Who stands to be hurt if Amendment E is not passed?"
Would it be the South Dakota Bar Association and lawyers? NO!
Would it be the South Dakota Legislature? NO!
Would it be the
insurance companies and agencies?
IT WOULD BE THE VOTERS
OF SOUTH DAKOTA
WHO WOULD BE HURT.
(By Ron Branson)
Inherent truth supersedes every charge or argument that may
be laid against it, because it is -- inherent truth! Inherent truth
exists whether or not anyone believes or agrees with it. It just
is -- "inherent truth!" It is irrelevant whether
anyone is confused over what inherent truth is. They will either learn to abide
by inherent truth or suffer the consequences.
There has never been a time in which inherent truth did not
exist, but there certainly has been a time when men did not understand inherent
truth. Inherent truth is not invented; it can only be discovered. For instance,
was there a time when there were neither judges nor courts? Of course! And
before there existed laws or courts, there existed murder. Just
because there existed neither laws nor courts, did this absence render
murder acceptable? Of course not! Why? Merely because murder defies inherent truth, aside from the existence
or non-existence of laws and courts!
In due time, it seemed only reasonable that
men should establish among themselves judges and courts to adjudicate
claims for the purpose of bringing about justice. "Justice," therefore, is
inherent truth! But what if the law became perverted by special interests and
was interpreted to plunder the rights of one for the personal benefit of
another? For instance, in the recent Kelo v. New London decision, 125
S.Ct. 2655, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it is "just" to
take away the private property of "A" by "law" and give it to "B" for the
latter's special interests. Again, like murder, such
pronouncement defies inherent truth whether sanctioned by "law" or
The U.S. Supreme Court is not the final determiner of inherent
truth; rather, it is inherent truth that is the determinant of the Supreme
Court. If the Supreme Court is consistent with inherent truth, its determination
is right. On the other hand, if the Supreme Court determination is
inconsistent with inherent truth, it is wrong. Any other
reasoning makes the justices of the Supreme Court gods, and not men.
If it be agreed that these justices are not gods, and that
they are indeed men subject to human error and the influence of special
interests, or even willful misconduct, to whom shall society
appeal for the inherent truth of justice? Remember, justice, being inherent
truth, is not an option. If everyone on the face of this planet opposed
"justice," would "justice" cease to be inherent truth? No! It would simply mean
that everyone on planet earth was wrong.
Was there a time before there existed citizen juries?
Certainly! Yet, before juries were physically manifested, juries have
been, and are nonetheless, "inherent truth!"
Inherent truth has no beginning; it always is, even before it is
discovered. There exists but only a time at which such inherent truth is
discovered, such as with juries. Our Founding Fathers were enlightened as to
this inherent truth, and penned it down firmly in our Constitution with the
words, "The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by
jury..." Article III, Sec. 2, clause 3. In the late 1960s, beginning in
California, legislators around the country began to "legislate away" the
inherent truth of juries in the name of "infractions." Therefore,
infractions defy inherent truth.
Interesting is the fact that all artificial "laws" defying
inherent truth must be propped up with many other truth-defying laws. However
laws that are consistent with inherent truth are self-evident, which goes
without saying. Who enforces the law of gravity? Who enforces the law of
centrifugal force? Who enforces the law of aerodynamics? or death? Inherent
truth ignores the devices of evil men, and goes on being -- inherent
truth! Men come and go, but inherent truth remains firm. It may be opposed, but
never defeated. No man can defeat inherent truth whether or not that inherent
truth has yet been discovered, because it is -- inherent
Beyond trial juries, our Founding Fathers were further
enlightened as to the inherent truth of Grand Juries. The Associated Press,
on February 15, 2006, in an article written by Chet Brokaw, "Senate Panel calls
for defeat of ballot measure on judges" states these words, "Schoenbeck said Ron
Branson, the California man who started the judicial accountability movement, is
mistaken in his belief that a grand jury should be the top power in government."
These words from Senator Schoenbeck in opposition to
J.A.I.L. are interesting in view of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury..."
Some states do not have Grand Juries. So how can such
states hold anyone to answer for a capital or felony offense committed within their
state? Constitutionally, they can't. Translated, this means that anyone can
be a mass murderer in that state and never be held to answer for their
crime. All power and jurisdiction over such crimes
rests purely with the Grand Jury. But in those states,
there is none.
While no prosecutor, attorney general, or governor has
jurisdiction to act in such cases, a Grand Jury does exclusively. This may
come as a shock to many of you, but this is precisely what the U.S.
Constitution mandates to all states. In the absence of a Grand Jury, anyone
can literally get away with murder. But murder is wrong and cannot be
tolerated. It violates inherent truth.
Now in light of the U.S. Constitution, let's revisit South
Dakota Senator Schoenbeck's
statement, "Ron Branson, the California man who started the
judicial accountability movement, is mistaken in his belief that a grand jury
should be the top power in government." Not only
should Grand Juries be the top power, but
they are the top power over government.
They have the exclusive power to do what no other entity within
government can do, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
South Dakota annunciates inherent truth in its
Constitution, Article VI, Sec. 26, which states, "All political power is
inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their
authority..." But what if some, including all of their own
legislators, did not agree with this inherent truth? They are
For instance, a few days ago, March 20, 2006, to be specific,
the "Insurance Journal" that claims to represent 1,400 insurance companies
nationwide, in an article titled, "National Insurer Group Opposes S.D.
Judicial Ballot Initiative" states, "Schmelzer added that stopping the South
Dakota effort is an essential step in discouraging similar initiatives in other
states that permit citizens to amend their constitutions by direct election." In
other words, an overwhelming number of insurance companies in the U.S., through
the voice of their representation, are seeking to defeat the
immutable inherent truth that "All political
power is inherent in the people." These identified subversive
insurance companies associated with NAMIC (National Association of Mutual
Insurance Companies) around the
nation are banding together to overthrow the People's inherent right nationwide
to the initiative process by which they may vote as they deem proper for
their future security. These companies seek to overthrow the inalienable rights
of the American People to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, "That to
secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed..." Declaration of
Bottom line, the South Dakota J.A.I.L.
Amendment (Amendment E) is self-evident inherent truth as it is also to
every state in this nation. Just because our Founding Fathers did not see in
their day the inherent truth of J.A.I.L. does not make it any less
Inherent Truth. J.A.I.L., as a means of protecting life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, has just recently come to light
in America 200 years after our Founding Fathers established our
Constitution; but in their day, J.A.I.L. was yet inherent truth that only
now has become self-evident. It can never be defeated.
There is no Army on earth that can defeat
inherent truth any more than Congress can, with all its power, revoke the
law of gravity. Regardless of the millions spent to defeat it, the
inherent truth of J.A.I.L. is here to stay! Even were
it possible that the opponents of South Dakota J.A.I.L. would succeed in
deceiving the S.D. voters with millions of bucks this November 7th, in due
time J.A.I.L. shall rise again to present itself as self-evident
inherent truth. America's future demands it! It
cannot be otherwise!
On our website, href="../../index.html">www.jail4judges.org are the words in
animation, "J.A.I.L. will surely one day be on the lips of everyone from Sea to
shining Sea." (Click here). There is no mind or authority that can conjure a way to declare
J.A.I.L. as non-inherent truth! And even if it were so declared, it would still
be -- inherent truth! Should there ever arise any
attempt to call J.A.I.L. something else, it will still remain
-- inherent truth! Its precepts
cannot and will not be defeated.
Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org
manage subscription, place the word Subscribe or
in 'subject' line
and hit reply. Your request will be
automatically & instantly
processed. (Note: Program will not permit
re-subscribes once unsubscribed.)