J.A.I.L. News Journal
Judicial  Accountability  Initiative  Law
Los Angeles, California                                   August 17, 2007


The Battle Lines are Drawn:  J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power 

A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

Mission Statement      JNJ Library        ederal J.A.I.L.

FAQs              What?MeWarden?

Perseverance, Steadfastness, 

and Consistency of J.A.I.L.

 (Re-Post of Inherent Truth 3/25/06 Below)


The conclusion of the recent J.A.I.L. News Journal The Will of The People Negated is J.A.I.L.'s comment which appears below. We deem it appropriate to re-post our Journal dated 3/25/06 titled Inherent Truth located at http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2006/2006-03-25A.html which is an enlarged version of the comment below. It shows the perseverance, steadfastness, and consistency in J.A.I.L.'s resolve, despite the battle that it has encountered in South Dakota and continues to endure across the country today. J.A.I.L stands, and will continue to stand, against the wiles of the devil.




Comment by J.A.I.L.

Just by the sheer fact that the judiciary, and now also the other branches of "government," have chosen to engage with J.A.I.L. is indicative that they have already lost the war! When J.A.I.L. was first conceived in 1995, no one was giving public attention to the judiciary. Since that time over the years, J.A.I.L. has pumped out over ten million pieces of educational material relating to the judiciary.
At one time, the judiciary had hoped that no one would pay attention. Their hope has been dashed to pieces, and as former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has repeatedly expressed, she is hearing more criticisms about the judiciary than at any other time in her lifetime. See The Judiciary Under Attack as Never Before, http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2007/2007-04-06.html.


The foregone conclusion in a public battle of J.A.I.L. v. The Judiciary is NOT who is going to be the winner and who is going to be the loser, for the controversy itself proves that J.A.I.L. is the undisputed winner by virtue of the battle!


J.A.I.L. has already won over this nation's judiciary, and thereby over this nation itself! All that remains is the unveiling, by pulling the sheet off the "J.A.I.L. Monument." There is no warfare that can, or will, defeat the J.A.I.L. Initiative!


-Ron Branson-

CIC, National J.A.I.L.



J.A.I.L. News Journal
Re-posted August 16, 2007
(originally posted before the South Dakota election)
Los Angeles, California                                          March 25, 2006
The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or Reform Abusive Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend
              Mission Statement               JNJ Library                    
Federal J.A.I.L.                           FAQs                    What?MeWarden?

"Who stands to be hurt if Amendment E is not passed?"
Would it be the South Dakota Bar Association and lawyers? NO!
Would it be the South Dakota Legislature? NO!
Would it be the insurance companies and agencies?  NO!

Inherent Truth!
(By Ron Branson)
Inherent truth supersedes every charge or argument that may be laid against it, because it is -- inherent truth! Inherent truth exists whether or not anyone believes or agrees with it. It just is -- "inherent truth!" It is irrelevant whether anyone is confused over what inherent truth is. They will either learn to abide by inherent truth or suffer the consequences.
There has never been a time in which inherent truth did not exist, but there certainly has been a time when men did not understand inherent truth. Inherent truth is not invented; it can only be discovered. For instance, was there a time when there were neither judges nor courts? Of course! And before there existed laws or courts, there existed murder. Just because there existed neither laws nor courts, did this absence render murder acceptable? Of course not! Why? Merely because murder defies  inherent truth, aside from the existence or non-existence of laws and courts!
In due time, it seemed only reasonable that men should establish among themselves judges and courts to adjudicate claims for the purpose of bringing about justice. "Justice," therefore, is inherent truth! But what if the law became perverted by special interests and was interpreted to plunder the rights of one for the personal benefit of another? For instance, in the recent Kelo v. New London decision, 125 S.Ct. 2655, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it is "just" to take away the private property of "A" by "law" and give it to "B" for the latter's special interests. Again, like murder, such pronouncement defies inherent truth whether sanctioned by "law" or not! 
The U.S. Supreme Court is not the final determiner of inherent truth; rather, it is inherent truth that is the determinant of the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court is consistent with inherent truth, its determination is right. On the other hand, if the Supreme Court determination is inconsistent with inherent truth, it is wrong. Any other reasoning makes the justices of the Supreme Court gods, and not men.
If it be agreed that these justices are not gods, and that they are indeed men subject to human error and the influence of special interests, or even willful misconduct, to whom shall society appeal for the inherent truth of justice? Remember, justice, being inherent truth, is not an option. If everyone on the face of this planet opposed "justice," would "justice" cease to be inherent truth? No! It would simply mean that everyone on planet earth was wrong.
Was there a time before there existed citizen juries? Certainly! Yet, before juries were physically manifested, juries have been, and are nonetheless, "inherent truth!" 
Inherent truth has no beginning; it always is, even before it is discovered. There exists but only a time at which such inherent truth is discovered, such as with juries. Our Founding Fathers were enlightened as to this inherent truth, and penned it down firmly in our Constitution with the words, "The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury..." Article III, Sec. 2, clause 3. In the late 1960s, beginning in California, legislators around the country began to "legislate away" the inherent truth of juries in the name of "infractions." Therefore, infractions defy inherent truth. 
Interesting is the fact that all artificial "laws" defying inherent truth must be propped up with many other truth-defying laws. However laws that are consistent with inherent truth are self-evident, which goes without saying. Who enforces the law of gravity? Who enforces the law of centrifugal force? Who enforces the law of aerodynamics? or death? Inherent truth ignores the devices of evil men, and goes on being -- inherent truth! Men come and go, but inherent truth remains firm. It may be opposed, but never defeated. No man can defeat inherent truth whether or not that inherent truth has yet been discovered, because it is -- inherent truth!
Beyond trial juries, our Founding Fathers were further enlightened as to the inherent truth of Grand Juries. The Associated Press, on February 15, 2006, in an article written by Chet Brokaw, "Senate Panel calls for defeat of ballot measure on judges" states these words, "Schoenbeck said Ron Branson, the California man who started the judicial accountability movement, is mistaken in his belief that a grand jury should be the top power in government."
These words from Senator Schoenbeck in opposition to J.A.I.L. are interesting in view of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury..."
Some states do not have Grand Juries. So how can such states hold anyone to answer for a capital or felony offense committed within their state? Constitutionally, they can't. Translated, this means that anyone can be a mass murderer in that state and never be held to answer for their crime. All power and jurisdiction over such crimes 
rests purely with the Grand Jury. But in those states, there is none.
While no prosecutor, attorney general, or governor has jurisdiction to act in such cases, a Grand Jury does exclusively. This may come as a shock to many of you, but this is precisely what the U.S. Constitution mandates to all states. In the absence of a Grand Jury, anyone can literally get away with murder. But murder is wrong and cannot be tolerated. It violates inherent truth.
Now in light of the U.S. Constitution, let's revisit South Dakota Senator Schoenbeck's 
statement, "Ron Branson, the California man who started the judicial accountability movement, is mistaken in his belief that a grand jury should be the top power in government." Not only should Grand Juries be the top power, but they are the top power over government. They have the exclusive power to do what no other entity within government can do, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
South Dakota annunciates inherent truth in its Constitution, Article VI, Sec. 26, which states, "All political power is inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their authority..."  But what if some, including all of their own legislators, did not agree with this inherent truth? They are wrong! 
For instance, a few days ago, March 20, 2006, to be specific, the "Insurance Journal" that claims to represent 1,400 insurance companies nationwide, in an article titled, "National Insurer Group Opposes S.D. Judicial Ballot Initiative" states, "Schmelzer added that stopping the South Dakota effort is an essential step in discouraging similar initiatives in other states that permit citizens to amend their constitutions by direct election." In other words, an overwhelming number of insurance companies in the U.S., through the voice of their representation, are seeking to defeat the immutable inherent truth that "All political power is inherent in the people." These identified subversive insurance companies associated with NAMIC (National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies) around the nation are banding together to overthrow the People's inherent right nationwide to the initiative process by which they may vote as they deem proper for their future security. These companies seek to overthrow the inalienable rights of the American People to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, "That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..." Declaration of Independence.
Bottom line, the South Dakota J.A.I.L. Amendment (Amendment E) is self-evident inherent truth as it is also to every state in this nation. Just because our Founding Fathers did not see in their day the inherent truth of J.A.I.L. does not make it any less Inherent Truth. J.A.I.L., as a means of protecting life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, has just recently come to light in America 200 years after our Founding Fathers established our Constitution; but in their day, J.A.I.L. was yet inherent truth that only now has become self-evident. It can never be defeated.
There is no Army on earth that can defeat inherent truth any more than Congress can, with all its power, revoke the law of gravity. Regardless of the millions spent to defeat it, the inherent truth of J.A.I.L. is here to stay! Even were it possible that the opponents of South Dakota J.A.I.L. would succeed in deceiving the S.D. voters with millions of bucks this November 7th, in due time J.A.I.L. shall rise again to present itself as self-evident inherent truth. America's future demands it! It cannot be otherwise!
On our website, href="../../index.html">www.jail4judges.org are the words in animation, "J.A.I.L. will surely one day be on the lips of everyone from Sea to shining Sea." (Click here). There is no mind or authority that can conjure a way to declare J.A.I.L. as non-inherent truth! And even if it were so declared, it would still be -- inherent truth! Should there ever arise any attempt to call J.A.I.L. something else, it will still remain -- inherent truth!  Its precepts cannot and will not be defeated. 


J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org  

To manage subscription, place the word Subscribe or Unsubscribe

in 'subject' line and hit reply. Your request will be automatically & instantly

processed. (Note: Program will not permit re-subscribes once unsubscribed.)


Our Founding Fathers said, "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and

our sacred honor." Declaration of Independence. We are a ministry in great need of your financial support. Send your donations for this vitally important work to:

J.A.I.L.  P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603


J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!


E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4judges.org/Flash.htm


*   *   *

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to

our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to

their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless

minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who i

striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                     ><)))'>

Return To JNJ 2007

Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years

South Dakota Vote Fraud
FTC Comments on the Definition of the Practice of Law

Responses to Articles and Shows

Join J.A.I.L.
Donate To J.A.I.L.
Buy A J.A.I.L. T-Shirt & Bumper Sticker
State and Federal Sites
Black Collar Crime
J.A.I.L. News Journal
Judicial Horror Stories
Branson's Legal Briefs
National J.A.I.L. Contacts and Groups
Animated Introduction
Spread The Word
J.A.I.L. Constitution & By Laws
Mission Statement
J.A.I.L. Cannot Give Legal Advice
Website Comments
Current Events
Links Of Common Interest
Yahoo Group