March 25, 2006
The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter
or Reform Abusive Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights
"Who stands to be hurt if Amendment E is not
Would it be
the South Dakota Bar Association and lawyers? NO!Would
it be the South Dakota Legislature?
Would it be
the insurance companies and agencies?
IT WOULD BE THE VOTERS
OF SOUTH DAKOTA
WHO WOULD BE HURT.
(By Ron Branson)
Inherent truth supersedes every charge
or argument that may be laid against it, because it is -- inherent
truth! Inherent truth exists whether or not anyone believes or agrees with it.
It just is -- "inherent truth!" It is irrelevant
whether anyone is confused over what inherent truth is. They will either learn
to abide by inherent truth or suffer the consequences.
There has never been a time in
which inherent truth did not exist, but there certainly has been a time
when men did not understand inherent truth. Inherent truth is not invented; it
can only be discovered. For instance, was there a time when there were
neither judges nor courts? Of course! And before there existed laws or courts,
there existed murder. Just because there existed neither laws nor courts,
did this absence render murder acceptable? Of course not! Why? Merely because
murder defies inherent truth, aside from the existence or
non-existence of laws and courts!
In due time, it seemed only
reasonable that men should establish among themselves judges and
courts to adjudicate claims for the purpose of bringing about justice.
"Justice," therefore, is inherent truth! But what if the law became perverted by
special interests and was interpreted to plunder the rights of one for the
personal benefit of another? For instance, in the recent Kelo v. New
London decision, 125 S.Ct. 2655, the U.S. Supreme Court determined
that it is "just" to take away the private property of "A" by "law"
and give it to "B" for the latter's special interests. Again, like
murder, such pronouncement defies inherent truth whether sanctioned by
"law" or not!
The U.S. Supreme Court is not the final
determiner of inherent truth; rather, it is inherent truth that is the
determinant of the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court is consistent with
inherent truth, its determination is right. On the other hand, if the Supreme
Court determination is inconsistent with inherent truth, it is
wrong. Any other reasoning makes the justices of the Supreme
Court gods, and not men.
If it be agreed that these justices are
not gods, and that they are indeed men subject to human error and the
influence of special interests, or even willful misconduct, to whom
shall society appeal for the inherent truth of justice? Remember,
justice, being inherent truth, is not an option. If everyone on the face of this
planet opposed "justice," would "justice" cease to be inherent truth? No! It
would simply mean that everyone on planet earth was wrong.
Was there a time before there existed
citizen juries? Certainly! Yet, before juries were physically
manifested, juries have been, and are nonetheless,
"inherent truth!" Inherent truth has no
beginning; it always is, even before it is discovered. There exists but only a
time at which such inherent truth is discovered, such as with juries. Our
Founding Fathers were enlightened as to this inherent truth, and penned it down
firmly in our Constitution with the words, "The trial of all crimes, except in
cases of impeachment, shall be by jury..." Article III, Sec. 2, clause 3. In the
late 1960s, beginning in California, legislators around the country began to
"legislate away" the inherent truth of juries in the name of "infractions."
Therefore, infractions defy inherent truth.
Interesting is the fact that all artificial
"laws" defying inherent truth must be propped up with many other truth-defying
laws. However laws that are consistent with inherent truth are self-evident,
which goes without saying. Who enforces the law of gravity? Who enforces the law
of centrifugal force? Who enforces the law of aerodynamics? or death? Inherent
truth ignores the devices of evil men, and goes on being -- inherent
truth! Men come and go, but inherent truth remains firm. It may be opposed, but
never defeated. No man can defeat inherent truth whether or not that inherent
truth has yet been discovered, because it is -- inherent
Beyond trial juries, our Founding Fathers
were further enlightened as to the inherent truth of Grand Juries. The
Associated Press, on February 15, 2006, in an article written by Chet Brokaw,
"Senate Panel calls for defeat of ballot measure on judges" states these words,
"Schoenbeck said Ron Branson, the California man who started the judicial
accountability movement, is mistaken in his belief that a grand jury should be
the top power in government."
These words from Senator Schoenbeck in
opposition to J.A.I.L. are interesting in view of the Fifth Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand
Some states do not have Grand Juries, such
as Idaho. So how can such states hold anyone to answer for a
capitol or felony offense committed within their state? Constitutionally, they
can't. Translated, this means that anyone can be a mass murderer in that
state and never be held to answer for their crime. All power and
jurisdiction over such crimes rests purely with the Grand Jury.
But in those states, there are none.
While no prosecutor, attorney general,
or governor has jurisdiction to act in such cases, a Grand Jury does
exclusively. This may come as a shock to many of you, but this is
precisely what the U.S. Constitution mandates to all states. In the absence
of a Grand Jury, anyone can literally get away with murder. But murder is
wrong and cannot be tolerated. It violates inherent truth.
Now in light of the U.S. Constitution, let's
revisit South Dakota Senator Schoenbeck's statement, "Ron Branson, the
California man who started the judicial accountability movement, is mistaken in
his belief that a grand jury should be the top power in government." Not only
should Grand Juries be the top power, but
they are the top power over government.
They have the exclusive power to do what no other entity within
government can do, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
South Dakota annunciates inherent truth
in its Constitution, Article VI, Sec. 26, which states, "All political
power is inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their
authority..." But what if some, including all of their own
legislators, did not agree with this inherent truth? They are
For instance, a few days ago, March 20,
2006, to be specific, the "Insurance Journal" that claims to represent 1,400
insurance companies nationwide, in an article titled, "National Insurer
Group Opposes S.D. Judicial Ballot Initiative" states, "Schmelzer added that
stopping the South Dakota effort is an essential step in discouraging similar
initiatives in other states that permit citizens to amend their constitutions by
direct election." In other words, an overwhelming number of insurance companies
in the U.S., through the voice of their representation, are seeking to
defeat the immutable inherent truth that
"All political power is inherent in the people." These
identified subversive insurance companies associated with NAMIC (National
Association of Mutual Insurance Companies)
around the nation are banding together to overthrow
the People's inherent right nationwide to the initiative process by which they
may vote as they deem proper for their future security. These companies
seek to overthrow the inalienable rights of the American People to life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, "That to secure these rights, governments
are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed..." Declaration of Independence.
Bottom line, the South Dakota J.A.I.L.
Amendment (Amendment E) is self-evident inherent truth as it is also to
every state in this nation. Just because our Founding Fathers did not see in
their day the inherent truth of J.A.I.L. does not make it any less
Inherent Truth. J.A.I.L., as a means of protecting life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, has just recently come to light
in America 200 years after our Founding Fathers established our
Constitution; but in their day, J.A.I.L. was yet inherent truth that only
now has become self-evident. It can never be defeated.
There is no Army on earth that can defeat
inherent truth any more than Congress can, with all its power, revoke the
law of gravity. Regardless of the millions spent to defeat it, the
inherent truth of J.A.I.L. is here to stay! Even were
it possible that the opponents of South Dakota J.A.I.L. would succeed in
deceiving the S.D. voters with millions of bucks this November 7th, in due
time J.A.I.L. shall rise again to present itself as self-evident
inherent truth. America's future demands it! It
cannot be otherwise!
On our website, href="../../State_Chapters/dc/DC_initiative.doc">www.jail4judges.org are the words in
animation, "J.A.I.L. will surely one day be on the lips of everyone from Sea to
(Click here). There is no mind or authority that can conjure a way to declare
J.A.I.L. as non-inherent truth! And even if it were so declared, it would still
be -- inherent truth! Should there ever arise any
attempt to call J.A.I.L. something else, it will still remain
-- inherent truth! Its precepts
cannot and will not be defeated.
Vote YES on Amendment