J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles, California June 4, 2007
Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L.
versus The Foreign Power
A Power Foreign
to Our Constitution
More O'Connor Propaganda
By Barbie, ACIC National J.A.I.L.
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce [the People] under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government..." Declaration of Independence.
We must constantly pound this into the heads of the People from now 'til Kingdom come, because it is what the People must do for the sake of liberty and justice for all in this country. The Declaration admonishes the People of their duty "to throw off such government" when "a long train of abuses and usurpations" designed to place the People "under absolute despotism" comes along and does exactly that.
The People must remember that, although
the Declaration uses the term "such government" to describe the despotic entity
operating by "abuses and usurpations," it is a non sequitur, for "such"
government is not government at all. At best, it is "such
so-called government." The Declaration
establishes the purpose of government thusly: "That to secure these
[unalienable] rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed..." Securing our unalienable
rights does not equate with despotism, nor with abuses and usurpations. Nor do
the latter terms comport with the consent of the governed.
Part of discarding their cloak of
ignorance, the People must come to realize that they don't have a government
protecting their rights, and haven't had for a long time. The "long train of abuses and usurpations" has
pulled into the Station of America and has been docked there for at least the
lifetimes of everyone reading this article. This "train" has been emitting
poisonous fumes infecting everyone in this country-- some more than others-- and
the longer it remains, the more toxic our lives become. It's been a poisoning
gradual enough so that many people have grown accustomed to it and have even
become somewhat immune, not even realizing that they have been poisoned. If we
had a government in place, the People wouldn't be exposed to this plague of
injustices that has now reached epidemic proportions. The People cannot afford
to continue to sleep in ignorance. Its crippling effects have become
Our Constitution is designed to form a
government that will function according to the purpose for which it was
instituted by the People with power derived from their consent as set forth
therein. However, the power in force has no regard for the Constitution as we
can observe from its actions. It is foreign to the Constitution, and hence it is
a foreign power. "Such government" is a foreign power that must be thrown off by
the People if we are to restore
America to health.
The People must further realize that our
court system sits at the helm of this
foreign power, operating its control panel and causing it to
continue to emit its poisonous
fumes of absolute despotism upon the People , not unlike the "wizard"
behind the curtain in "The Wizard of Oz." The top echelon operating the control panel in
this country is the United States Supreme Court, the case precedents of which is
the "Supreme Law" of the foreign power rather than the
Constitution. As was stated by the Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, in the
Right to Petition lawsuit by We The People Foundation, "We need not
resolve this debate, however, because we must follow the binding Supreme Court precedent."
despite the fact that all judges take an oath to uphold and defend the
Constitution-- not "Supreme Court precedent." However, the proof is "in the
pudding" when we read decisions like that one.
because of the threat of J.A.I.L. being passed by the People in carrying out
their duty to throw off "such government," the foreign power has arranged to have an
influential spokesperson to sell its poison --its "snake oil"-- to the People.
And who better to fill that role than retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor, that kindly grandmotherly-appearing image, dressed in a
fashionable red dress to offset her silver coiffure, comfortably seated in an
easy chair with her hands neatly relaxed in her lap? Would someone that lovely,
so loving of her family, so concerned for the children in this country,
LIE to the American people?
considering the content of that interview, the People should consider the fact
that no equal time opportunity was offered to any spokesperson for
J.A.I.L. No rebuttal to be allowed by a J.A.I.L. representative? Ask
yourselves, is there something dishonest about that arrangement-- regardless of
what was said? How can the truth of O'Connor's word be tested without
rebuttal? Is O'Connor's word presumed to be the truth simply by virtue of
her high position? If that is so, then because of her high position, she was
able to say anything she pleased --including LIE--
without the possibility of qualified rebuttal. That's exactly what
has already been on the circuit during the South Dakota campaign, going around
speaking against J.A.I.L. on the premise that in all her years on the bench she
has never experienced such a broad negative attitude by society against the
judiciary. She lays claim to that bewilderment on people "not liking the
decisions that judges make." She then gives an example, bringing up the
election in South Dakota where "there was a proposal on the ballot to amend
the State's Constitution called jail for judges..." She never
explained the J.A.I.L. acronym. She said that this proposal would "punish"
judges for decisions they would make, although J.A.I.L. says NOTHING about
"decisions." See JNJ dated November 22, 2006, titled
"Decisions, Decisions, Decisions!" http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2006/2006-11-22.html.
lovely-appearing distinguished lady wouldn't deliberately state to the American
people on national television that this proposal provided something
really wasn't in that proposal,
would she? Did she have a copy of the proposal with her from which she could
read aloud to the American people the portion she was discussing? Did the
interviewer ask if she had a copy of it, or could provide it? I didn't see
any direct reference to the J.A.I.L. Amendment at any time during that
interview, and yet no rebuttal opportunity for J.A.I.L. was even
retired Supreme Court Justice, why wouldn't O'Connor provide evidence of what
she was stating to the American people on national television? Her profession
consisted of reviewing evidence to prove issues-- ergo, why wouldn't she, by
virtue of her profession, automatically realize the importance of providing
evidence of her issues regarding J.A.I.L.? Would a retired Supreme Court
Justice simply not think of it? or wouldn't it occur to her? This refined
professional lady wouldn't allow such irresponsibility to mislead the American
people on national television, would she?? Would a responsible national
television news station, like FOX News, allow this misleading of its audience
without any opportunity of rebuttal? How many times have you heard on
television, "We invited XYZ to respond, but they declined"? Was J.A.I.L.
invited to respond?
these are things to think about whenever you hear anything regarding J.A.I.L.
Don't just assume that what you're hearing is the truth without PROOF, and the
best proof --the only proof-- is the J.A.I.L. Amendment
itself. The foreign power relies on you NOT requiring proof of its
contentions against J.A.I.L. They relied on that in South Dakota, and because
the People did not demand proof, the propaganda ruled the roost. Are the People
of America going to jeopardize their future by continuing to allow this to
J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org
To be automatically added to future
mailings, place the word Subscribe in the subject line and
email to VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
We are a ministry in great need of your
financial support. Please donate to this important
work at "J.A.I.L." P.O.
Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603
J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our
Constitution heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL
is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Visit our active flash -
He has combined with others to subject
us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our
laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation.
- Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a
majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush
fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a
thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."
-- Henry David
Return To JNJ 2007
Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years