J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles, California                              February 24, 2007


The Battle Lines are Drawn:  J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power 

A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

 Is It Right to do Wrong to do Right?

By Ron Branson, National J.A.I.L. CIC


To receive future mailings, enter "Subscribe" in the subject bar

The idea that it is alright to do a wrong in order to accomplish a right is nothing new. This humanistic philosophy goes back to the beginning of time, and is condemned by the Apostle Paul in his rhetortical question, "Let us do evil, that good may come?" Romans 3:8. Put in modern-day terms, we describe it as "the end justifies the means." It is argued that since the goal is to accomplish a "good cause," it is therefore alright to do evil in order to accomplish that "good cause." In short, this is the theory behind all tyrants and evil empires. Communism argues that since the overriding objective is "universal good for all mankind," it is therefore commendable to use falsehood, subterfuge and lies to accomplish its end. Therefore private rights must be either ignored or surrendered even if it requires bloodshed. (War is good if it accomplishes peace.)

Now why do I say all this? I have said this to lay the foundation for the below Miami Herald article in which government attorneys argue that exposure of government hurts the integrity of government, and therefore it is justifiable to falsify court records to deceive the people and the news agencies to keep the public from knowing what they are doing. Of course, this goal requires the participation of the judges in order to accomplish this desired objective. As I have said for years, the participation of the judiciary is behind everything one hates about government, and without judicial accountability, there is no possibility of correcting the unconstitutional evils of "government" which ceases to be government, but is transformed into a foreign power via usurpation.




Prosecutors seek OK to create phony files


Prosecutors are urging a change in state law to allow them to falsify court records in some cases.

LEADING INQUIRY: Court Chief Justice R. Fred Lewis is conducting a statewide inquiry into the hiding of court records after The Miami Herald reported that hundreds of civil and criminal cases, mostly in Broward County, were kept hidden on secret dockets.

Florida's prosecutors are floating a proposal to the Legislature to give them the power to secretly falsify public court records -- with a judge's approval -- for undercover law enforcement purposes.

Spurred by Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernández Rundle, the draft bill would limit the authority to manufacture and plant fake documents in court files to 180 days. But it also provides for an unlimited number of 30-day extensions.

''Judges would be very involved in the monitoring. It all has to go through a judge,'' said Arthur I. ''Buddy'' Jacobs, general counsel for the Florida Prosecuting Attorneys Association, which supports the bill.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida opposes the idea.

''The fundamental problem is that it so goes against our notion of the way our justice system ought to work,'' said ACLU legislative director Randall Marshall. ``How would we ever be able to trust anything in the judicial record knowing that something could be intentionally falsified with a judicial seal of approval?''

Tallahassee Public Defender Nancy Daniels said the proposal undermines constitutional protections for those charged with crimes.

''Even if this is temporary, what if someone testifies during that time and we never get to know they had a criminal conviction? We can't properly cross-examine to develop their motives for giving testimony,'' Daniels said.

The bill has been prefiled with the Florida Senate for the legislative session that begins March 6.

A second, longer version of the bill has been prefiled with the House. It would convey authority to falsify any public record to prosecutors, judges, mayors, sheriffs, coroners and other public officers unless they were acting corruptly.

The Miami Herald reported late last year how judges and prosecutors in Miami-Dade had official court records altered and kept secret dockets to disguise what was happening in some court cases.

Two cases were uncovered in which court dockets were altered to cover up the felony convictions of informants, but more are known to exist. Chief Assistant State Attorney Jose Arrojo said authorities have altered the public records of informants for two decades.

It is a crime for anyone in Florida, including judges and prosecutors, to alter or falsify court records or proceedings. Violators can be sent to prison for a year.


The prosecutors' push to change Florida criminal statute 839.13 comes amid a statewide inquiry by Supreme Court Chief Justice R. Fred Lewis into the improper hiding of court records. The probe began last summer after The Miami Herald reported that hundreds of civil and criminal cases, mostly in Broward County, were kept hidden on secret dockets.

More recently, Lewis asked the Florida Bar to examine the propriety of falsifying court records and to recommend rule changes by March 1. The high court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on secret and false dockets March 5.

Rundle sent a letter to the chief justice in December defending the practice of altering public court records as occasionally necessary to protect informants and investigations. She also announced that Miami-Dade judges and prosecutors would no longer ''affirmatively'' falsify dockets.

In response, the Florida Public Defenders Association has asked that the practice be banned.

Ed Griffith, a spokesman for the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office, said the bill is a priority for the prosecutors' association, but declined to comment further.

The Senate sponsor is Dave Aronberg, D-Greenacres, vice chairman of the criminal justice committee. The House sponsor is Rep. Julio Robaina, R-South Miami.

''Ultimately, this protects the public against the evil of corruption,'' Aronberg said. ``It's just another tool. How else can you get at a corrupt judge unless you create false pleadings?''


In an e-mail to Aronberg's office, Ted Mannelli, executive director to the state attorney, wrote that prosecutors have used the technique in ``two scenarios.''

''In a very, very, very limited number of cases, perhaps less than five over the last two and one half decades in our circuit, bogus court records have been generated in corruption investigations targeting judges,'' Mannelli wrote.

The other scenario Mannelli described involves any case in which defendants plead guilty and sentencing is deferred to let informants work undercover.

Mannelli did not say how many times that has happened.

He wrote in the e-mail and confirmed in a phone interview that prosecutors believe Florida's prohibition on altering court records doesn't apply to them because they have acted ``without corrupt intent.''

The law, however, makes no such distinction. The Florida Supreme Court also has ruled that a lack of corrupt intent does not excuse the faking of court records.

1997 CASE

Broward County Judge Laran Johnson backdated records in an apparent attempt to keep her caseload low. In 1997, the court removed her from office because ``her knowing and repeated acts of falsifying public records strike at the very heart of judicial integrity.''

Today, prosecutors want the law changed to make sure ''these procedures are clearly legal and allow for their continuation,'' Mannelli said in the email.

It is said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I pose the following questions:

  • Is it justifiable for government to commit crime in order to catch criminals?
  • Is it justifiable for government to falsify documents in order to catch people who falsify documents?
  • Is it justifiable to commit fraud to catch people who commit fraud?
Government argues that it is justified only if it is the government doing it, because it is for that infamous "overriding governmental interest." And the judges said "Amen! My Brother Lawyers - preach it!"  -Ron

J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org

To be automatically added to future mailings, place the word Subscribe in the subject line and email to VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org 

We are a ministry in great need of your financial support. Please donate to this important work at "J.A.I.L." P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603

J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!

E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4judges.org/Flash.htm

*   *   *

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                        <><

Return To JNJ 2007

Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years

South Dakota Vote Fraud
FTC Comments on the Definition of the Practice of Law

Responses to Articles and Shows

Join J.A.I.L.
Donate To J.A.I.L.
Buy A J.A.I.L. T-Shirt & Bumper Sticker
State and Federal Sites
Black Collar Crime
J.A.I.L. News Journal
Judicial Horror Stories
Branson's Legal Briefs
National J.A.I.L. Contacts and Groups
Animated Introduction
Spread The Word
J.A.I.L. Constitution & By Laws
Mission Statement
J.A.I.L. Cannot Give Legal Advice
Website Comments
Current Events
Links Of Common Interest
Yahoo Group