J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles, California January 19, 2007
The Battle Lines Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power
J.A.I.L. Has Exposed the Foreign Power Running South Dakota
J.A.I.L. will always have a purpose For The People
About a month before the election, a South Dakotan told us that State Attorney General Larry Long said on SD television, words to the effect, "We don't need anyone from Hollywood (meaning California) telling us how to run South Dakota." That's because Long was speaking on behalf of the Foreign Power, under the guise of the State, running South Dakota. That Power doesn't want anyone outside of itself --even citizens of South Dakota-- to interfere with its programme` which operates in its own self-interests, not that of the People, because under its agenda "the People" don't even exist --the populace of South Dakota are slaves in its "book," a number.
Before reading further, go to What Did the "Show-Election" in South Dakota REALLY Show? There I explain the "foreign power" and why it is so, with plenty of evidence hyperlinked to prove it. Did you ever wonder why the Power running the "show" (literally) in South Dakota would act as if to say: "We won't be reformed!We don't care what the South Dakota Constitution says. We don't care what South Dakota statute says. We don't care what the Declaration of Independence says. We don't care what the U.S. Constitution says. There's no need for judicial reform in South Dakota. We like it just the way it is, and it'll stay that way. And we'll hold a Show-Election to prove it!" Didn't it strike you as "impossible"? Not in this country? How can this happen so blatantly, and yet nothing is done? All members of this Foreign Power are still "in office" in South Dakota at taxpayers' expense!
I ended that J.A.I.L. News Journal (JNJ) with the following question: What happens when a foreign power that has taken over control in this country prevents the People from exercising their inherent rights? And then stated: J.A.I.L. on the ballot in South Dakota has brought this question to light!
When J.A.I.L. was first written in 1995, the intended purpose was to bring judicial accountability to the People because the judiciary was abusing the doctrine of judicial immunity, thereby preventing redress of grievances by the People against unconstitutional actions by judges. California authorizes the People to reform government when they deem it necessary by the Initiative process. It wasn't long before other states wanted to do the same in their states, including South Dakota, and people from those states requested our permission to allow them to propose J.A.I.L.
South Dakota was the pioneer state for J.A.I.L. in which the People qualified the Amendment for their ballot in 2006. To get a measure passed by the People requires the basic right to vote without interference by any power, civil or military. (SD Const. Art.VII §1). Little did we know or suspect that the Power running South Dakota would interfere with the election process, resulting in a "Show-Election." "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006, resulting in the annihilation of the People's right to reform their government (SD Const. Art.VI §26) and their right to a fair election (SD Const. Art.VII §1).
We realized the propaganda that was being poured out on the People of South Dakota, but we thought they would know better, especially after reading the text of the Amendment for themselves to see the truth of the matter. We never dreamed that the voters would be deprived of a published Voters' Guide with full text of all issues to be voted on, plus all arguments for and against each issue, so that they would be well informed before casting their vote. Everyone we talked to asked "Didn't they receive a Voters' Guide explaining issues and giving all arguments pro and con?" People couldn't understand why that wouldn't be done in South Dakota. (We couldn't either). We now know that this would be possible ONLY with a Foreign Power in charge.
It was by this fiasco in South Dakota that J.A.I.L. shone the spotlight on the evil Foreign Power that was, indeed, in control over the People by fraud, deception, concealment, and nefarious criminal conduct, all of which we have shown the evidence therefor. So the purpose of J.A.I.L. has become, in South Dakota, to expose to the People the Foreign Power running that state. We will all remember November 7, 2006 as a Landmark Event in American history! Let this be a warning to other states-- it can, and probably will, happen there.
One of the leaders of this Foreign Power is the judicial sentry, commonly called the
"Bar Association." In fact, Thomas Barnett, executive director of the State Bar of South Dakota, who admittedly led the fraudulent campaign against J.A.I.L., is now spreading his wares to the Florida Bar. See The Looming War For The Minds of Americans from which we produce the following excerpt:
The public face of that campaign should not be judges and lawyers, but rather regular citizens who would be adversely affected by the amendment...
Tom Barnett, executive director of the State Bar of South Dakota, gave that advice to the Bar Board of Governors at its December meeting. ...
Barnett said one poll showed that allowing jurors to be sued was opposed by 86 percent of the voters. “It's a very, very powerful message,” he said. “That's why we used that.” In seeking support for its campaign against the amendment, he said opponents looked to the users of the court system, particularly the business community. Barnett said he explained the consequences of the amendment, including that relatively simple matters like repossessions of cars and mortgage foreclosures could become much more complicated and expensive if the debtors decided to fight their cases through the special statewide grand jury. That jury, he added, would be able to nullify contracts which could leave lenders with an empty bag. The consequences? Car dealers might find lenders unwilling to finance automobile purchases and banks might be unwilling to issue mortgages, he said.
J.A.I.L. has one target, and one target only-- JUDGES, and for only the seven constitutional violations specifically stated in ¶2 of the Amendment, nothing else. It is a far cry from the lies spewed out to intimidate the public, as knowingly misrepresented by Barnett. But as long as the People are foolish enough to take the bait in believing this Foreign Power, they'll be trapped and "forever" remain willing victims of this despotic Foreign Power that has taken over, as has happened to the People of South Dakota. How many more states will this Foreign Power conquer over J.A.I.L.? All we can do is warn the People, which is what we did for South Dakotans.
J.A.I.L. has the Foreign Power running scared for its life-- literally! Passage of J.A.I.L. will crush the life out of the Foreign Power, and they know it! J.A.I.L. is the ONLY means that can touch the Foreign Power-- the ONLY means that can penetrate its iron shield. We have reported on retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in her attempt to brainwash the public against J.A.I.L., saying it will destroy the independence of the judiciary-- ANOTHER LIE!
Just recently, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales got into the anti-J.A.I.L. act. In an article posted January 17, 2007, in Globeandmail.com "World"
Lara Jakes Jordan of Associated Press reports: "Mr. Gonzales characterized efforts to retaliate against unpopular rulings as misguided, noting a failed South Dakota proposal to sue or jail judges for making unpopular court decisions." --YET ANOTHER LIE! You know that J.A.I.L. is hitting a raw nerve when the Attorney General of the United States comes out publicly to denounce J.A.I.L! Just WHO or WHAT is misguided, Mr. Gonzales? And the lies will continue to spew forth at an ever-increasing pace throughout the year! Ladies and gentlemen, this is J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power! Stay tuned.
Mr. Branson prepared a South Dakota website, www.sd-jail4judges.org in which he heavily details the fraud and wrongdoing by "government" in South Dakota. If you haven't read that website, we encourage you to do so. We point out that everything on that site was written prior to the election. At the end, he says:
What Can Be Done About This Election Fraud In South Dakota?
First, we recommend you pray. "The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." James 5:16 "Call unto me, and I will answer thee, and shew thee great and mighty things, which thou knowest not." Jeremiah 33:3
Secondly, after you have humbly prayed and committed your heart to the Lord in faith, you are advised to compose a criminal affidavit setting forth the particulars as described above, and submit it to your local F.B.I. Office, urging them to open a criminal investigation of State Attorney General Larry Long for seeking to influence an election. In a nutshell, the Attorney General has inverted, through manipulation, the objective of J.A.I.L. from jurors going after judges to criminals going after jurors. Likewise, name specific State Legislators in their individual capacity for the crime of utilizing their public offices and public funds for campaigning against a state ballot initiative, in violation of South Dakota Codified Law 12-13-16.
To place this misconduct, committed by these legislators, in perspective, it is serious enough that even the President of the United States may be impeached on commission thereof, to wit, "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." U.S. Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 4. (Note the inclusion of misdemeanor crimes.)
Likewise, the South Dakota Constitution, Art. XVI, §3, in pertinent part, states, "Officers subject to Impeachment -- Grounds -- Removal from office -- Criminal prosecution. The Governor and other state [legislative]...officers ... shall be liable to impeachment for ... crimes, corrupt conduct, or malfeasance or misdemeanor in office..."
Thereafter, submit an adapted version of your criminal affidavit, which you submitted to the F.B.I., to your local county Grand Jury, demanding a criminal investigation and indictment of the specific legislators you named, preferably your own!
Lastly, again seek God's face and ask Him to plead your cause and show you His Wondrous Works on our behalf. "Thus saith the LORD: Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the LORD." Jeremiah 31:16.
In order for the People to be able to exercise their rights to reform government and to vote, they must first know what kind of entity is controlling those processes that can block those rights. We're referring specifically to getting J.A.I.L. passed by lawful means. J.A.I.L. IS STILL THE ONLY REMEDY FOR THE PEOPLE. The People will have to determine, based on evidence, the nature of the power in control in order to decide what method is necessary to carry out the mandate set forth in the Declaration of Independence: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security."
The answer to my previous question, What happens when a foreign power that has taken over control in this country prevents the People from exercising their inherent rights? is that the People must decide what method of change is required "to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." One thing we know: Change is necessary; change will happen. The Laws of Nature will demand it. Being under the control of a Foreign Power is not in accordance with the state of nature, and it cannot remain that way by Nature.
Change will occur either by Reform (J.A.I.L.) or by Revolution. Changes in constitutions and laws could be done to bring about changes gradually. Societies, which do not follow this path have changes thrust upon them by forces beyond their control. Reform means to change, usually a reversion to what is perceived to be a pure original state. It has been used for any change thought to be positive, however.
A revolution (from Late Latin revolutio which means "a turn around") is a significant change that usually occurs in a relatively short period of time. ... [R]evolutions as a two-step process; first, some change results in the present situation being different from the past; second, the new situation creates an opportunity for a revolution to occur. In that situation, an event that in the past would not be sufficient to cause a revolution ..., now is sufficient.
John Locke, known as the "Philosopher of Freedom" had the greatest influence on the Declaration of Independence. "Government, according to John Locke, will lose its right to exercise its power, however, when government abuses its people worse than any imaginable group of marauders that might be operating in the absence of a government. ... Further, in Lockian theory, if government abuses the exercise of the power given it by the people, why then, the people have a natural right to rebel, as did the people of New England in 1776." The Theory of Government, By Peter Landry.
"The fact that our rights are unalienable means something more, merely than that we are born with them, or that we cannot give them away. It means also that if we fail to defend our rights, we dishonor ourselves. The price of liberty is high. To fail to pay that price is a great wrong." What is the Right of Revolution?
J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - href="../../index.html">www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau
Return To JNJ 2007
Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years