J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles,
California
October 26,
2005
______________________________________________________
Bill Stegmeier, the South Dakota JIC, will be going
to the Atlanta Rally
on November 11-14 and will give an update on
the South Dakota J.A.I.L. Campaign. We are grateful to him and
everyone who had a part
in making this Campaign possible!
J.A.I.L.
WILL Go Forward!
Following are comments from Nick Testaccio in response to our
recent JNJ titled "It's the MEANS of J.A.I.L.
That Sets It Apart." Below that is Ron's response followed by
Barbie's.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2022
6:56 AM
Subject: How will people
reconcile through JAIL that which they refuse to hold
now?
I read your journals,
sometimes comment on them and either receive no answer or one that is
completely off the mark from what I have said.Yes Jefferson, as many of
our Founding Fathers, stated that it was up to us to enforce the
Constitution. The majority of the people are ill equipped, or reticent
about enforcing it, as they have not the basic understanding of what
the Constitution is and represents.
Today the vast majority, including the
legal community, believes the Constitution to be a document that
defines our rights. That has been accomplished by a reengineering of
the education system. The Constitution is, of course, a document that
enumerates the limited powers of the government, stating clearly only
those areas to which the government may
legislate.
Once again I ask
you, how will the same people, who refuse to understand their original
position, reconcile through JAIL that which they refuse to hold
now? Do you have any understanding of the human dynamic? Do you
understand that even when faced with facts, people will not believe
that which is contrary to their indoctrination?
Do you understand that even when passed, the JAIL
initiative will face the same reengineering from those the majority
continually puts back into office? You are still playing the game as
your adversary has instructed you.
(response from
Ron):
Hello,
Nick:
Here is the
problem we face here at J.A.I.L., we are receiving so many responses
that it is impossible to keep up. Some we have to just delete, others
we preserve for possible future response, but often just receive so
many new issues to deal with that we can never get to them. This
is the negative side of a good thing. So what happens when one
is so successful that they cannot deal with their success? This is
where we are right now in J.A.I.L.. We have to just pick and choose
what matters we can deal with, and the rest send over the dam. Yes,
and matters are not getting better, but
worse.
You ask,
"Once again I ask you, how will the same
people, who refuse to understand their original position, reconcile
through JAIL that which they refuse to hold now?" There is a saying, Nick, that no
one argues with success. As the multitudes of people rally
to J.A.I.L., I figure that we just will not have time to deal with
those naysayers who wish to refute that success. In other
words, if the naysayers are drowned out by the noise of success,
they become insignificant. We just ignore them and go on. Is
there a moon shining during the full light of a hot summer day?
What's the relevance? God bless you,
Nick.
-Ron
(from
Barbie):
Nick, let me add my
two cents to what Ron already said. We understand that there will always
be those "who refuse to understand their original
position, [will not be able to] reconcile through JAIL that which
they refuse to hold now." There will always be those who just plain
refuse to accept J.A.I.L. as a credible means
of the People protecting their rights from a despotic power-- but my
question is, "Is there anything better offered for the People" to break
through the tyranny we are living under? If you have a better idea,
let's hear it! Do you know of anything that would replace
J.A.I.L.?
It's time people
stop complaining and do something about the problem. Now that we have a
solution ready to be passed into law, there are still people like you who
insist on complaining --that the
solution won't work! It's not enough to keep
complaining about the problem-- complain about the proposed solution as
well!
J.A.I.L. is going
forward, despite the naysayers, because if we waited until all the
complainers were satisfied, J.A.I.L. would NEVER become a reality.
After your question is answered, whether the answer is
accepted is another question. There'll always
be yet more questions. Let's get the
darn thing PASSED! Then we can deal with questions
like yours. Right now is not the time to keep
hindering the process of going forward with J.A.I.L. This is such a
vital measure to save this country from annihilation that we can't afford
to ask so many question NOW. Look at what just happened to Irwin Schiff
due to the tyrannical courts! Are you going to keep asking all
these questions instead of doing everything you can to see that J.A.I.L.
is passed? Just maybe the People can prevent more "Irwin Schiffs" from
going down the tubes! (This means on any
issue-- not necessarily the tax issue. Anyone
who fails to get due process of law, regardless of the issue of the
case, can bring the matter to J.A.I.L.) Don't you see how critical
it is? If you don't understand every jot and tittle about J.A.I.L., don't
allow that to stifle this effort. GO FORWARD anyway, at least for now. A lot of questions will be settled
once J.A.I.L. is passed. Most questions will be irrelevant
anyway!
Also, we understand
that the vast majority of people don't understand squat about the
Constitution. That doesn't mean that those that DO understand have to put
everything on "hold" because of those who don't-- and probably never
will. Constitutional victory will not come by the majority, but by a
minority who will stand up for the People, including those who "don't
understand." We want to pass J.A.I.L. for their sakes-- whether
they "understand" or not. Otherwise they're going to hell in a
handbasket, and those of us who do understand don't want that to happen
to them-- or to us!
"..it does not
require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel
Adams
Your closing
paragraph states: Do you
understand that even when passed, the JAIL initiative will face the same
reengineering from those the majority continually puts back into office?
You are still playing the game as your adversary has instructed
you.
Nick, first of all, J.A.I.L. is a
People's measure. The People are in charge--
not anyone that is "put back into office" or in office whatsoever. That's
the problem we've had-- the People have NOT been in charge as they should
have been. J.A.I.L. is going to change that. To the contrary Nick, our
"adversary" has not instructed Ron to create the
J.A.I.L. Amendment, to lead it nationally, and to get it passed into law.
Ron has been instructed by the Supreme Adversary
of the
"adversary."
-Barbie