J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California                                    September 13, 2005
______________________________________________________
Mission Statement                  JNJ Library                     PayPal Support
Federal J.A.I.L.  
                         FAQs                    What?MeWarden?
 
www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.org

Clarification About
The Special Grand Jury
Below is my response to one of our readers which will be helpful for everyone in understanding the composition and role of the Special Grand Jury in the J.A.I.L. process. If any of you have further questions or comments, let us know. Please do not compare the J.A.I.L. process to any governmental operation.  -Barbie
 
Mr. Gauger:
 
Your first sentence states: The SGJ members have been and no doubt will be and are untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs, threats, etc.
 
Let me ask you, did you read the J.A.I.L. Initiative before making that statement?  The reason I ask is because your statement regarding the SGJ and comparing it with a trial jury in the system, when he got a jury trial, the ignorant, brainwashed, pressured sheeple of the jury found him guilty of phony made up charges has nothing to do with facts. The Special Grand Jury of J.A.I.L. cannot be remotely compared to any jury in the current system.
 
Here's what the initiative states about the SGJ. (I'll quote from the South Dakota J.A.I.L. Initiative, since that's the one currently active in preparing to qualify for the 2006 ballot):
3. Special Grand Jury. For the purpose of returning power to the People, there is hereby created within this State a thirteen-member Special Grand Jury with statewide jurisdiction having power to judge both law and fact. This body shall exist independent of statutes governing county Grand Juries. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, on an objective standard, whether any civil lawsuit against a judge would be frivolous or harassing, or fall within the exclusion of immunity as set forth in paragraph 2, and whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the judge complained against.
 
Since it refers to paragraph 2, I'll quote that paragraph as well:
2. Immunity. No immunity shall extend to any judge of this State for any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of South Dakota or the United States, notwithstanding Common Law, or any other contrary statute.
 
The first thing to note about the SGJ is that it isn't a trial jury-- J.A.I.L. doesn't try anyone. Its function is limited to determining whether a judge is entitled to immunity or should be subject to a jury trial for alleged violation(s) of law, like any other defendant. Also, the SGJ may determine whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by a judge complained of. In neither event does the SGJ determine guilt or innocence.
 
In determining whether or not immunity would apply to a judge, the SGJ is guided by paragraph 2 which describes the particular violations for which the judge may be held accountable at a subsequent trial should the complainant thereafter elect to sue the particular judge as a separate case not involving the J.A.I.L. process. Of course, any judge involved in any such subsequent trial that violates the law described in paragraph 2 may likewise be subject to scrutiny by the SGJ if a complaint is filed therefor.
 
It is important to note that the SGJ "shall exist independent of statutes governing county Grand Juries." (3). The Special Grand Jury shall be truly autonomous and independent of government control. The same cannot be said of any jury, grand or petit, operating in the system. Those juries, controlled by government, are indeed subject to corruption, as you mention below. Please also note that "[t]hose not eligible for Special Grand Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the State Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel,...." (12).
 
Regarding your further comments:  two constitutions, corporate U.S., bankruptcy, etc., I stated before (see below), and I repeat:
Judges can make these arguments when they come before the Special Grand Jury and the SGJ can determine whether it will fly. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and J.A.I.L. will resurrect it. Judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution-- not the UCC code.
 
Now is not the time to make those arguments. When J.A.I.L. becomes functional, all judicial defense arguments will be thoroughly examined by the SGJ and any research staff they retain to determine their legitimacy, lawfulness and authority. Fraud, deception, and conspiracy will not be acceptable.
 
I encourage you, and everyone, to re-read the JNJ "To Enforce the Constitution" dated October 23, 2004, regarding the basis on which J.A.I.L. will operate. If you would like us to send you a copy, let us know. 
 
In closing, I say this: Even if the judicial system worked perfectly and the Special Grand Jury never had to act because no complaints were filed against a judge (quite a hypothetical), the People still need J.A.I.L. in place to ensure that we maintain our Constitutional Republic. The People have too much at stake to not have that assurance. We're not given that assurance by any commissions on judicial conduct or any other governmental agency.
 
-Barbie-
ACIC, National J.A.I.L. Admin.
victoryusa@jail4judges.org
 

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Albert Gauger
To: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"

Barbie - The SGJ members have been and no doubt will be and are untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs, threats, etc. Dave Hinckson in Idaho had law suits going against the Dist. att. and a Judge. The swat team broke into his home in middle of the night, hand cuffed him, had him sit outside in the winter in the cold and broke up the place even though he offered them keys, etc. He was held in county jail without being charged for over a year. Guess what? I understand that when he got a jury trial, the ignorant, brainwashed, pressured sheeple of the jury found him guilty of phony made up charges and he was expert on the CON-situation and law. Do you understand that the U.S.A. is a private CORPORATION AND IS BANKRUPT! The judges took an "oath" to observe the Constitution, but which Constitution? Do you assume that they mean the Constitution that supposedly this country is founded upon, or that their "oath" may be to the private bankrupt USA CORPORATION  CON-situation?   Did you ever check this out? Why not check this out with Big Al who is one of the premiere Christian researchers in the nation. We are unable to learn anything about Dave Hinckson, where he is, how he is, etc. Do you have any info on him? gatr
----- Original Message -----
From: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
To: Albert Gauger
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"

Judges can make these arguments when they come before the Special Grand Jury and the SGJ can determine whether it will fly. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and J.A.I.L. will resurrect it. Judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution-- not the UCC code.
 
-Barbie
victoryusa@jail4judges.org
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Albert Gauger
To: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"

Ron - The CON-situation is a dead horse. The current Law is the Uniform Commercial Code, (U.C.C.) the old law of merchants, the governments, both state and federal are "Corporations" that are BANKRUPT! These "Corporations" are DEBTORS to the CREDITORS who  control the activities of these "Government" entities and the flesh and blood people employed by these "entities" that carry on the functions. If not already connected suggest you get on the address book of American Patriot researcher bigal123@ncol.net and visa versa. gatr

 
 
J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash,
http://www.jail4judges.org/Flash.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at
JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
Your help is needed: www.sd-jail4judges.org
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><

Return To JNJ 2005

To JNJ Library Index for All Years