Well, I'm glad he had a lot of helpers in preparing this book, but the real
beauty about it, as I see it, is the fact that is it written by a judge-- and
that alone says a lot! On behalf of J.A.I.L. I thank Judge Napolitano for
publishing this book to at least inform the public about the government
corruption that exists in this country, and lending his credibility as a
judge to expose so many facets of it. What I particularly appreciated about it
is that he points out how more often than not, it's the judiciary
that puts its stamp of approval on government corruption by
looking the other way when matters come before the court-- witnesses are
"bought" for testimony that will help the government's case; judges are bribed
for favorable decisions; and police and other officials routinely lie in reports
and on the stand-- with the judge's knowledge.
Judge Napolitano (hereinafter "Judge N") said that he didn't realize that
the corruption is as bad as it is-- especially police and prosecutor conduct. He
said words to the effect: Do you know what made me wake up to this
reality? Answer: My eight years on the bench. Prior to that,
Judge N classified himself as strictly a law-and-order conservative, but
since becoming an acting judge, he has learned to become "a rugged
individualist" as he put it. His moral values wouldn't allow him to accept
the law-and-order brigade once he found out how they actually operated. His main
theme throughout the book was "How government breaks the law in order to enforce
It's another way of saying "The end justifies the means" which is the way
government works. Having worked closely with law enforcement myself for many
years, I know the goal is to get as many arrests as possible, and as many felony
convictions as possible. In fact, contests were run between offices throughout
the county on which office would get the most convictions per month. In order to
get the most convictions, the police had to be "in good" with the prosecutors,
and the prosecutors had to be "in good" with the judges. I sure didn't see
through this at the time, but since leaving and getting into the court battle
personally, my wake up to the corruption was shocking to say the least. After
more than 20 years since my "wake up," I
still shake my head in disbelief. This is
happening in AMERICA!
Judge N did a good job giving synopses of some of the most egregious events
involving the organized crime of law enforcement in this country. He covered
Janet Reno's escapades in Florida even before she became the top law enforcement
officer of this nation which gave her plenty of experience to pull off the Waco
disaster. Besides the Waco scenario, he also fully described the Ruby Ridge
assault and murders and the Elian Gonzalez kidnapping in Miami, all to
Reno's "credit," stating that apparently these federal officials not only have a
license to kill, but also immunity from prosecution. Judge N also discusses some
of the Mafia crime games, the police syndicate involving planting evidence and
kicking in tail lights, false reports and testimony, and other "niceties," and
an inside look at the Guantanamo Bay fiasco-- the no man's land where prisoners
are allowed by our "government" to be held indefinitely
without the imposition of criminal charges-- like a
black hole into which undesirables are thrown because they "might be" or
"could be" dangerous.
Oh, it's a real eye opener, and coming from a judge, it is truly a gripping
testimony about the real criminals-- those wearing badges. And it isn't being
told by a "disgruntled litigant" (especially a "pro se") who just didn't "like"
the court's decision or the "way" the judge handled his case.
Although I've read some negative reports about Judge N's personal
background on the internet, that should not detract from the public service
he did in writing his book "Constitutional Chaos." What he exposes in that book
is what is important for the public to know and understand.
Friends, we must give credit where credit is due, and after reading Judge
N's book "Constitutional Chaos" he deserves our thanks for bringing this evil
empire, and why it is so, to the people's attention. It is clear from what he
says in his book that he has respect for the Constitution-- something that few
judges have. He realizes that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with duck
hunting, and he tells us why. He realizes that the Fourth Amendment forbids law
enforcement from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures and that the
Supreme Court has found a way to circumvent that guarantee. He has an entire
section titled "Bye-Bye, Fourth Amendment." And he devotes a major part of his
book to the violation of the First Amendment. Folks, at least according to his
book, Judge N is on the right track!
While giving credit where credit is due, and to the extent that it is due,
there is one major shortfall to the book. He doesn't give us a viable solution
to the vast problem he describes. I find it hard to believe that Judge N never
heard about J.A.I.L. I know Bill O'Reilly has heard about it, but fails to give
it any credibility. Why? We don't know. Before I realized that Judge N was a
close associate of Bill's, I said to Ron that Bill probably has too many friends
who are judges-- and that is a real problem with the media. They are "bought and
paid for" by the judicial system and the entire law enforcement criminal cartel.
So this is what the People have to deal with --and We
will! It'll take a little longer without the media's help, but the
People (at least enough of them) will not give up. Judge
N often sits in for Bill O'Reilly on his Radio Factor show. Knowing what he
knows about organized crime at the official level in this country,
just maybe the judge will see
the importance of J.A.I.L. If he has not heard about J.A.I.L. up to now, I'm
sure he'll hear about it now, after people read his book.
In his chapter "What Can We Do?" Judge N suggests that the solution lies
with Congress and state legislatures enacting legislation requiring law
enforcement to comply with all the laws. Do we need a "law to enforce the law?"
Would that new law be enforced any better by the same corrupt entity that
"enforces" existing laws?
What is needed is a process carried out by the
People, (not more laws or more government) to hold
judges accountable to the People. Existing laws
on the books are fine-- the problem is too much politics and too little ethics.
It's the People that must take ultimate control when
the system fails. That's what J.A.I.L. will accomplish.
Judge N also suggests that the legislatures (state and federal) should make
it easier to sue government officials for monetary damages. That won't happen as
long as judges cover up for officials, and judges are immune from suit for their
cover up. As long as the "road to suing officials" comes to a dead end with
a block wall called "judicial immunity" and can go no further, it can't be
done. J.A.I.L. provides the process by which the People may penetrate that
absolute wall of immunity erected by the judiciary. Only then will people
be able to open the way to sue arbitrary government officials for monetary
damages, or any other relief provided by laws that already exist. One of our
notable JAILers, Bill Gage, illustrates this premise by an analogy of
judges being the alligators swimming in the moat protecting
the executive/legislative castle from suit.
Judge N comes close to the solution when he talks about removing "sovereign
immunity" and even "personal immunity" of government officials when they commit
crime. We already have laws that remove immunity for officials who act outside
of their discretionary duties. Problem is-- they don't work. Is committing crime
within their discretion?
Folks, we cannot rely on a solution coming from government-- any part of
it. Government will not discipline itself, because there are no consequences to
it for failure and refusal to do so. Government is renegade because it can get
by with it-- simple as that! As President George Washington stated: "Government
is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force; and, like fire, it is a
dangerous servant and a fearful master!" Government must be viewed as
"spoiled children" and the most spoiled of all, needing the most
oversight, is the judiciary.
Judge N, we don't need more laws by Congress or the state legislatures. We
need enforcement of the laws we already have, particularly the Supreme Law of
the Land, the U.S. Constitution. And this must be done directly by
the People (not their legislators) who must "leash" the government
and make sure it doesn't continue to go astray. As the Declaration of
Independence states, it is the DUTY of the
People [not their legislators] "to throw off such government,
and to provide new guards for their future security." That will be
accomplished only by J.A.I.L. Judge, will you support this vital
Thank you Judge Napolitano.
ACIC, National J.A.I.L. Administration
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau <><