J.A.I.L. News Journal
April 23, 2004
(By Lawrence Agee, J.D.)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:53
Subject: Re: Mocking J.A.I.L.
At this point, the only current "remedy" to widespread
judicial fraud [without J.A.I.L.]
is through the courts. We all know this is no remedy because the judges
themselves have created "absolute immunity" for
The legislators will not do anything? Why? I don't know. I
suppose because most of them are lawyers and they like the easy
The executive branch won't do anything. Why? They claim
"separation of powers." Besides most of them are lawyers and they don't
want to rock the boat.
Those who dare to speak out are attacked, jailed, publicly
smeared and rendered unemployed. Every one who speaks up is either
jailed (to create a criminal record) or slandered in the media and the
The professionals who speak out are attacked the hardest
because the DA goes after their licenses. This precludes most
professionals from speaking out. See the Elena Sassower case for an
example of what happens to a smart lawyer who speaks out. Sassower went
to NYU. This is one of the top 5 law schools in the country. She has
been viciously attacked just for trying to stand up. See what happened
to Linda Kennedy. See what happened to Trafficant.
Everyone who has the guts to speak up is financially ruined
by a DA or a judge. This is happening everywhere. The more examples
they make, the more people are afraid.
They are quashing dissent just like some guy in Germany did
60 years ago. They are blacklisting us just like some guy in DC did 50
Is [J.A.I.L.] legislation the
answer? It may work because it removes the bulletproof veil. Can it be
passed? Maybe, if a state could get it on the ballot. Can it get on the
ballot? Maybe, if people collect signatures. Will people get the
signatures prior to the deadline to get this on the ballot? Doubt it.
Why? Not enough people to do the work? I don't know.
Someone needs to take the initiative and lead the effort.
Who? I don't know, someone anyone. Is any state making progress? They
don't have the initiative process where I am going. If anyone is
collecting signatures, give us some feedback.
Hang on to your hat. Following the 2004
elections, we plan to be out the door in collecting signatures for
South Dakota. Why after 2004 elections? Because that is the first date
we can legally collect signatures for the following election
Am I as anxious as you to get something visibly
going towards the passage of J.A.I.L.? Absolutely! I have been
hammering away at promoting J.A.I.L. now for nine years without
remuneration. I have made three attempts at gathering signatures in
California without any support funds.
I believe that now, for the first time we have a
genuine shot at having J.A.I.L. on the ballot in a state, and that
state is South Dakota. Our big task is going to be conditioning the
minds of the voters of South Dakota that this will be good for their
state, facing a whirlwind of the system, backed by the media, telling
those in South Dakota that this will be bad for South Dakota.
One thing it promises is that J.A.I.L. will
receive a flurry of attention by the national media. There will not
have been anything on the ballot post Civil War that will have created
more attention than J.A.I.L. And if we can get the entire nation in an
uproar over J.A.I.L., we will have accomplished a great Victory, as
J.A.I.L. is the Second Shot Heard 'Round The World.
So prepare to join in the war for the minds of
the people in South Dakota, and get caught up in the storm of
the flurry. This could be lots of fun.