Judges Hocking Your Child For Profit! Gentlemen/Ladies,

    I read about your [J.A.I.L.] activities in Los Angeles, California in an e-mail posted by [Professor] Stephen Baskerville.    Just thought I'd apprise you of another scam the judges are working. It involves child support collections, and returns millions directly, and quasi legally, to the judges. You see, when courts hear a case involving child support, they are paid directly by the child support collection agency. Since they are being paid for the same time by the state, this makes for a tidy profit. It also constitutes a breach of the mandate for separation of powers in the state and federal constitution. The judicial branch is not allowed to accept payments from executive/administrative branch agencies. Furthermore, it is a conflict of interest. It means, in real terms, that when a [parent] goes to court on child support related matters, [they are] facing a judge who is being paid by the opposition. An opposition who profits from the judges decision. (The collection agency is paid a commission for collecting.) *
    We have a letter on file with the State Supreme Court in New Hampshire from a federal attorney involved in a law suit contesting this practice which clearly states that the money is being paid to the court to insure "maximum result." That means "bribe"! The payoff to the courts in N.H. is over $290,000 per year (based on two year old figures). In Massachusetts, a slightly larger state, the payoff was $2,000,000. California, being much more populous, must be raking in tens of millions.
    To gain proof of this allegation, simply petition the child support agency for any and all documents relating to a contract between themselves and the courts regarding child support collections. Each state is required to have such an agreement in force in order to secure the federal kickbacks.

P. Clements - N.H.

* As you know, we have stated that the Lockheed Martin Corporation stockholders on the New York Stock Exchange are profiting mega-bucks nation-wide from the Child Support Industry. We expressed it as Love & Marriage / Judges & Corporations. One only needs pick a judge at random and draw out their Statement of Economic Interests and view their "revealed" corporate holdings. They may find, as we, multiple interest in banks and ownership of stocks in major corporations up the yen-yang. No wonder federal judges are nervous about making their holdings open knowledge, saying they fear for their safety. Does anyone doubt the need for J.A.I.L.?

Return to Home Page.